Interpreters vs. Compilers

We generally write a computer program using a high-level language. A high-level language is one which is understandable by us humans. It contains words and phrases from the English (or other) language. But a computer does not understand high-level language. It only understands program written in 0's and 1's in binary, called the machine code. A program written in high-level language is called a source code. We need to convert the source code into machine code and this is accomplished my compilers and interpreters. Hence, a compiler or an interpreter is a program that converts program written in high-level language into machine code understood by the computer.

The difference between an interpreter and a compiler is given below:

InterpreterCompiler
Translates program one statement at a time. Scans the entire program and translates it as a whole into machine code.
It takes less amount of time to analyze the source code but the overall execution time is slower. It takes a large amount of time to analyze the source code but the overall execution time is comparatively faster.
No intermediate object code is generated, hence interpreters are memory efficient. Compilers generate intermediate object code which further requires linking, and hence require more memory.
Continues translating the program until the first error is met, in which case it stops. Hence debugging is easy. It generates the error message only after scanning the whole program. Hence debugging is comparatively hard.
Programming language like Python, Ruby use interpreters. Programming language like C, C++, and Java use compilers.


Original text found at Programmiz, adapted by Paul Oser